Work with us as a trainer
Login / Register

Best Execution Under MiFID II & III: Essential Guidance for Cyprus Investment Professionals

Table of Contents

Introduction

The delimiting factor in Cyprus is that investment professionals must comply with an evolving financial regulatory framework of the EU-it is a professional necessity. Among the most important requirements is the best execution, a principle that makes certain investment firms are acting in the best interest of the client when executing orders.

Best execution was initially established in MiFID I and was further reinforced in MiFID II, including the proposed amendments for MiFID III, which will give additional emphasis to it. For compliance officers, traders, and executives based in Cyprus, the knowledge of how to put best execution into operation within the firm is of great importance if one is to maintain regulatory acceptance, client trust, and a market reputation.

Why Best Execution is Important to Cyprus Professionals

Client Protection: Best execution acts on behalf of protecting the investor by making sure that they get the most favorable terms available to them.

Regulatory Obligation: The CySEC licensed companies need to ensure compliance with the EU standards to keep their authorization.

Competitive Edge: Execution policies build client assurance; therefore, give firms nay advantage in an already crowded financial marketplace.

Risk Reduction: When operators adhere to compliance procedures, they circumvent fines, loss of reputation, and lawsuits.

The MiFID II Framework: Core Best Execution Obligations

Defining Best Execution

It is worthy of note that MiFID II defines best execution as taking into account, at all times and under all circumstances, all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible result for clients.

Execution Factors and Criteria

Main factors include:

  • Price
  • Costs
  • Speed
  • Likelihood of execution and settlement
  • The size and nature of the order

The relevance of the factors depends on the classification of the client (retail, professional, eligible counterparty).

Policies and Reporting Requirements

  • Firms are required to publish their execution policies that explain how orders are handled.
  • Transition to MiFID III: What's Changing

Enhanced Transparency Rules

  • MiFID III will, presumably, further tighten the level of reporting obligations imposed on firms, including greater tradability as to how execution decisions are made.

Investor Protection Mechanism Strengthening

  • Retail investors will have disclosures which are even clearer, as well as the monitoring of companies to check if they are truly acting in their client’s interests.

Key Challenges for Cyprus Investment Firms

1. Management of Data: How to collect and analyze data on trade execution at many venues.

2. Dilemma of Cost v. Speed: How to maintain execution at low cost and yet ensure a fast settlement.

3. Changing Technology: How to keep trading systems updated in compliance with new audit requirements.

4. Global Competition: Cyprus firms must conform with the EU rules and at the same time compete with bigger financial centers.

Strategies to Ensure Compliance

Building Effective Best Execution Policies

  • Review policies annually and update execution policies.
  • Ensure policies are catered to client types, products, and market conditions.

Leveraging Technology and Data Monitoring

  • Use trade surveillance tools to check order handling.
  • Implement real-time execution monitoring and analytics dashboard.

Staff Training and Culture Alignment

  • Train front-office staff to appreciate their contribution toward achieving best execution.
  • Develop a compliance culture where client outcomes come first over short-term-side profits.

Regulators in Cyprus

CySEC enforces MiFID II compliance, according to the laws. It undertakes inspections, issues circulars, and levies sanctions where appropriate. With MiFID III toward implementation, the increasingly bright spotlight on execution policies from CySEC would only make preemptive compliance more pertinent.

Career and Business Implications of Compliance

1. Primarily for Professionals: Compliance officers and traders that understand best execution are an enormous asset for the firms trying to deal with MiFID II/III.

2.  For Firms: Better compliance means better client retention and the attraction of foreign investors-a boost that sometimes goes begrudgingly toward long-term profitability.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Treat Best Execution as a Box-Ticking Exercise: Regulators want continuous monitoring and genuine improvements.
  2. Ignore Non-Price Factors: Execution quality means more than just cost.
  3. Poorly Explain to Clients: Using jargon where lay explanations would do.
  4. Infrequently Review Policies: Policies left to silo may very quickly become out of-line with the EU amendments.

Conclusion

Better execution is not simply a regulatory requirement. It is much more important: it is trust and integrity in the market. For Cyprus investment professionals, the adaptation to MiFID II obligations with potential preparation for MiFID III’s changes will be the make-or-break factor for future competitiveness.

➡️ Stay ahead of regulatory shifts by creating a technology-based monitoring system, training your staff on best execution, and engaging with Cyprus-based compliance experts. The investment companies that treat best execution as an intrinsic value rather than just another cost are likely to be the winning entity in the final stage of the financial transition in the EU.

References

  1. Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II) – eur-lex.europa.eu
  2. MiFIR Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 – eur-lex.europa.eu
  3. Proposed MiFID III Amendments – European Commission documents
  4. Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) – cysec.gov.cy
  5. ESMA Guidelines on Best Execution – esma.europa.eu
  6. CySEC Circulars and Announcements – cysec.gov.cy
  7. Investor Protection and Transparency Guidance – eur-lex.europa.eu
  8. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) – Best Execution Insights
  9. Market Abuse and Transparency Rules – eur-lex.europa.eu